V: "People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people."
Welcome Back The Spotlight 'O Terror
Green - Low: This setting is here just as a reference point. DHS will never use it because it would mean we didn’t need them anymore.
Blue - Guarded: This rarely used setting on the Stoplight ‘O Terror could indicate things like an undocumented worker within 3 square miles of the president.
Yellow - Elevated: This is the standard level of fear. Don’t expect to see anything lower than this as long as the Regressives are in office. Be scared, but not too scared to vote Republican.
Orange - High: Chertoff heard that someone in the CIA’s brother’s boss’ nephew’s sister-in-law heard about a plan to blow up Amish Country Popcorn Factory in Berne Indiana. It’s ok to pee your pants at this level.
Red - Severe: A terror attack was recently narrowly averted. We can’t release any details but just be thankful we saved your asses. Used frequently before midterm elections. See October Surprise. (Oh My God, Take Away My Freedoms and Protect Me From Them There Terrorists, Like Osama Hussein!!!)
Welcome to my Blog, enjoy your stay!
Congressman Ron Paul, MD - We've Been NeoConned

1984 radio broadcast:
As of this morning, September 4, 2007, Constitution Candidate Kevin Thompson has earned his place on the ballot in the Massachusetts fifth district race for Congress. Thompson handed in to the Secretary of State's office close to 2700 hundred confirmed signatures, well surpassing the needed 2,000. He will be listed on the ballot with the designation, Constitution Party Massachusetts.
"This is an historic day in Massachusetts," says Kevin, "The tide is beginning to turn. People are tired of the two party system and are demanding real change take place in Washington. I am calling on the citizens of the fifth district to once again take a stand for liberty. A vote for Kevin Thompson on October 16 will send Washington the message, 'We're not going to take it anymore!'" Thompson is the first Constitution Party member ever to gain ballot access in the state. Already, other Constitution Party candidates are gearing up for the 2008 elections.
The Constitution Party is the third largest political party nation wide, in terms of voter registration. "I am a proud member of the Constitution Party for it is the only national party left that actually believes in the system of government our Founding Fathers handed down to us. We stand together in opposing the onslaught of illegal immigration by securing our borders. We stand together in our efforts to bring our troops home by ending this unconstitutional war in Iraq. We stand together in the fight for the sanctity of life and traditional family values. We will bring government back to its Constitutionally limited role and off the back of the US taxpayer," declares Thompson.
To find out more about the Kevin Thompson for Congress Campaign, please log on to www.thompson07.com. To find out more about the Constitution Party, please log on to either www.cpoma.org or www.constitutionparty.com.
Kevin can use your support in this effort. Please log on to www.thompson07.com/support.htm to learn how you can lend a hand.
www.constitutionparty.com
London Telegraph September 3, 2007
Tim Shipman
In a nondescript room, two blocks from the American Capitol building, a group of Bush administration staffers is gathered to consider the gravest threat their government has faced this century: the testing of a nuclear weapon by Iran.
| |
The job of the officials from the Pentagon, the State Department, and the Departments of Homeland Security and Energy, who have gathered in an office just off Massachusetts Avenue, behind the rail terminus, Union Station, is to prevent a spike in oil prices that will pitch the world's economy into a catastrophic spin.
The good news is that this was a war game; for those who fear war with Iran, the less happy news is that the officials were real. The simulation, which took four months, was run by the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank with close links to the White House. Its conclusions, drawn up last month and seen by The Sunday Telegraph, have been passed on to military and civilian planners charged with drawing up plans for confronting Iran.
News that elements of the American government are working in earnest on how to deal with the fallout of an attack on Iran come at a tense moment.
On Tuesday, President Bush dramatically stepped up his war of words with the Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, whom the US government accuses of overseeing a covert programme to develop nuclear weapons. In a speech to war veterans, Mr Bush said: "Iran's active pursuit of technology that could lead to nuclear weapons threatens to put a region already known for instability and violence under the shadow of a nuclear holocaust."
He went on to condemn Iranian meddling in Iraq, where America increasingly blames the deaths of its soldiers on Iranian bombs and missiles. Mr Bush made clear that he had authorised military commanders to confront "Iran's murderous activities".
This was widely taken to mean that he is set on a confrontation with Iran that will culminate in a bombing campaign to destroy Iranian nuclear facilities, just as Israel bombed Saddam Hussein's Osirak reactor in 1981.
The president's intervention came just weeks after leaks from a White House meeting suggested that Vice-President Dick Cheney, who is understood to favour the use of force, has regained the upper hand over the Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Defence Secretary Robert Gates, who both advocate diplomacy and sanctions to isolate Iran. Mr Cheney reacted with fury when the State Department suggested that negotiations might continue past January 2009, when Mr Bush leaves the White House.
So the question is: did Mr Bush last week set America inexorably on a path to the next war?
Washington officials, with close links to the Pentagon, the State Department and the National Security Council, say that the speech was designed as a threat not just to Iran, but to America's Western allies, along with Russia and China, who have been slow to support - or who have opposed - UN sanctions against Iran. James Phillips, a Middle East expert at the Heritage Foundation, who helped devise the war-game scenario, said: "It is simultaneously a shot across Iran's bows and an appeal for the international community to do more to stop or slow Iran's nuclear programme."
A former White House aide added: "If this creates in the Iranians' mind a state of fear such that they back off, that helps your diplomacy. Bush is a political poker player. To play poker, you have to know when to bluff."
Mr Bush had another reason for speaking out, too. With General David Petraeus due before Congress on September 11 to report on progress on his "surge" in Iraq, Mr Bush wanted to make the case that a withdrawal from Iraq would boost Iranian influence there - in the hope that this would increase domestic support for his policies.
In Teheran, Mr Ahmadinejad was also quick to make the Iraq connection, but as an impediment, not impetus, to American adventurism. "We have an expression in Farsi which says, 'Bring up the one that you have given birth to first, then go for another one'," he said. "Let them do what they started in Afghanistan and Iraq then think of other countries." He dismissed threats of military action as "more of a propaganda measure than factual".
Read the full article here .
By John Lofton, Editor
PROFESSOR TURNER one more reason I thank God I never went to college.The following is an interview I did with Elizabeth Hayes Turner, co-author of “Galveston and the 1900 Storm” - a book about September 8, 1900, a day when a Category 4 storm hit Galveston, then a city of about 38,000, and one the most prosperous in Texas. After the storm, between six and ten thousand people were dead, and more than three quarters of the city was completely destroyed. Turner was, when we had our discussion, a professor of history at the University of North Texas.
I wanted to interview Turner to speak with her about whether any Federal aid was forthcoming to rebuild Galveston. Our conversation began cordially enough. But, when she discovered that I believe the Constitution forbids such so-called “disaster aid,” our conversation became - well - less cordial. Here’s the way things went:
Turner: No, there wasn’t Federal aid in that form at that time in 1900. So, what was sent were Army tents from the Spanish American and Civil Wars. Later on Federal money was sent to fortify the seawall around Ft. Crockett. The money to rebuild was from the state was in the form of a grant, a reduction in taxes for the citizens of Galveston. It was a very different America at that time. The Red Cross did come in and there were a lot of private donations. But for hurricane relief, I am unaware of any Federal money.
Turner then asks: “What is your position on Federal aid for disaster situations?”
Me: “Well, I am a Constitutionalist.” Mentioning Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, I say that if a spending proposal does not fit into any of these categories, “then Congress cannot spend the money.”
T: “You know, I don’t think I can help you after all. Because I believe very firmly that the Federal Government should have a hand in helping these [“Katrina”] victims. So, I can’t let my work be used in support of your view” (she had promised earlier to send me a copy of her book).
Me: So, where in the Constitution do you see any authorization for Federal disaster aid? I assume you believe the Federal Government should obey the Constitution and not spend money on just anything.”
T: Well, I think it’s in the elastic clause of the Constitution in Article I.
Me: I’m amazed to hear you say this since you just told me how this kind of Federal disaster aid was never thought of in, for example, 1900 when the hurricane hit Galveston. And, of course, this Federal aid was not thought of because it was believed to be un-Constitutional.
T: Well, historically it did not happen for Galveston but that doesn’t mean I agree with that. But, I don’t believe it’s that way any more. I hope we have evolved since then.
MY FELLOW Founding Fathers ‘extremists’ meeting in Philadelphia who, I believe, actually intended something specific when they gave us our Constitution.Me: But, the Constitution does not evolve.
T: It evolves every time there’s a Supreme Court decision [in this area] - (!!!).
Me: No, the Constitution is fixed.
T: It is not fixed.
Me: And this evolving Constitution idea is why, among other things, we have a $400 billion annual Federal budget deficit now.
T: That’s the Congress.
Me: Right!, because the Congress does not follow the Constitution! Congress sees the Federal treasury as a piggy-bank out of which to spend money on any thing regardless of what the Constitution says!
T: And it’s a Republican Administration that’s doing this.
Q: I agree and that’s a disgrace. But, our Founders did not believe this. They believed in the Constitution and if it was not followed this was illegal, a crime!
T: That’s your opinion.
Me: No, it’s not. That’s what they believed.
T: Yes, they did. But, how do we know their intentions?
Me: A lot of ways. Read the debates about the Constitution by the Founders.
T: And the Constitution is a living document. If it was not, then it would no longer be in existence.
Me: Well, in Washington DC the Constitution does not exist. It’s a dead letter. The Congress ignores it! And that’s sad - and illegal.
T: I think your views are extreme.
Me: Well, my views are the views of the Founders. If this is extreme, so be it.
T: I think we’re on really different sides of the political line.
Me: We are! I believe what our Founders believed; you don’t.
T: I do, too; I just interpret things differently.
Me: Well, I’m with Thomas Jefferson who said: “In questions of power then, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.” What do you say to that?
T: I don’t know what to say to that….I think the government must have the ability to be flexible in situations of emergencies like [that caused by Hurricane Katrina.]
Me: Arghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
By Jim Kouri
Posted 1:00 AM Eastern
September 4, 2007
NewsWithViews.com
During a speech for the conservative-libertarian think-tank the Cato Institute, best selling author and political satirist P.J. O'Rourke quipped: "If you think healthcare is expensive now, just wait and see how expensive it is when it's free."
During an election season, healthcare becomes the carrot liberals use to entice American voters, according to several Washington observers.
"During election cycles, the liberal-left and their news media comrades scare the hell out of Americans, who are told they'll be left to die in the streets by an uncaring medical profession. In the topsy-turvy world of journalism, shylock lawyers are the good-guys and physicians and hospital administrators are the bad guys," said a hospital director -- currently being sued in New York -- who spoke to NewsWithViews.com on the condition of anonymity.
While most conservatives are fretting over the possibility of a Hillary Clinton or John Edwards healthcare system, few of them seem to be aware of the ultimate goal -- an international healthcare system run by the United Nations.
The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America summit in Canada released a plan that established UN law along with regulations by the World Trade Organization and World Health Organization as supreme over US law and set the stage for militarizing the management of continental health emergencies.
The "North American Plan for Avian & Pandemic Influenza" was finalized at the SPP summit last week in Montebello, Quebec.
With virtually no media attention, President Bush has shifted US policy on avian flu and pandemic influenza, placing the country under international guidelines not specifically determined by domestic agencies.
The policy shift was formalized on September 14, 2005, when Bush announced a new International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic Influenza at a meeting of the UN General Assembly, in New York.
According to Nathan Tabor, author of the best selling expose' The Beast on the East River: The UN Threat to America's Sovereignty and Security, like the liberal-leftists in the United States who desire a One World Government, the UN leadership sees itself as the vehicle to achieve that goal.
"The UN's goal really is world government. Most people in the [United States] believe the ultimate goals of the UN are benign. But this vision doesn't match the hard facts," warns Tabor.
The new International Partnership was designed to supersede an earlier November 2005 Homeland Security report that called for a U.S. national strategy that would be coordinated by the Departments of Homeland Security, Health and Agriculture, and US Department of Defense press release "NORTHCOM prepares for possible pendemic."
Under the International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic Influenza, President Bush agreed the US would work through the UN to develop a continental emergency response plan operating through authorities under the WTO, North American Free Trade Agreement and the UN Food and Agriculture Organization.
There is no record that the Bush Administration presented the plan to Congress for approval. The US President appears to have entered into agreements with foreign nations and the United Nations in secret and without congressional oversight.
The SPP plan for avian and pandemic influenza announced at the Canadian summit two weeks ago embraces the international control principles Bush first announced to the UN in his 2005 International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic Influenza declaration.
"We are already very nearly at the point of no return," said Nathan Tabor, "and most Americans aren't even aware of the impending danger."
Related Article:
1, U.S. under U.N. law in health emergency
Important Informarion:
1, North America Plan for Avian and Pandemic Influenza
2, NORTHCOM Prepares for Possible Pandemic
3, U.S. Launches International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic Influenza
4, Homeland Securty Report
5, UN Press Conference
6, JTF-CS Faces Multiple Disasters During Joint Exercise
© 2007 NWV - All Rights Reserved
For radio interviews regarding this article:
COPmagazine@aol.com
“Which Way
Which way
to again consider amnesty for illegal alien immigrants, and Americans relaxed from its earlier defeat,
it’s time to again alert those 80% of our people who have favored closing our borders and expelling
illegals to let their voices be heard. Sponsors of amnesty are determined to undermine the authority of
our laws. Once again, we remind Americans that a condition of citizenship in the
In this broadcast, I want to quote from a letter to former Mexican President Fox from an author who used
a “penname.” He lived in
stated that he loved the people but despises their political system. He wrote that he wanted to bring his
family to
1. Everything including government services must be in English first and Spanish second.
medical services.
English and want them to be taught American culture and history.
signs and expect your police to overlook these issues; not to do so would be racist.
racist.
attend diversity training, and to learn English.
funds back to our relatives in
complaints about draining the Mexican economy.
the cost of the Mexican government.
population be not allowed to communicate our citizenship status with any police forces.
status at the voting poles.
most of
We are well aware that this is neither an outrageous request nor an unreasonable one. After all, these are
the very demands made by your countrymen as they illegally enter our nation. As we say up north here,
“what’s good for the goose is good for the gander.” We look forward to your response in this forum
ASAP.
Sincerely, Joe A. Texicali
Historians out there, tell me, has there ever been a country whose leadership more senselessly allowed
an invasion of their country, granting them benefits that even their own people could not claim, or a
country whose leadership was more dedicated to the destruction of their own country? Was even
ancient
Again, we want to alert all Americans with any common sense to bombard your
strongest disapproval of the passage of any bill that would grant amnesty to even one illegal alien invader
in the
murderers, potential terrorists, and those who would seek to stake a claim to our land. This, in our
opinion, makes good sense to anyone with good sense. Without vision, our people will perish!
I’m Jack McLain for the Constitution Party of Florida. Call us at (561) 741-7592. Our website:
www.cpflorida.com And thanks for listening.
|

© 2006
Jim Gilchrist’s MINUTEMAN PROJECT, Inc.
National Chapter Recruiting Campaign
Dear Americans,
Welcome to the Minuteman Project national chapter recruiting campaign.
Jim Gilchrist’s Minuteman Project, Inc. (dba The Minuteman Project), has created a new dimension in the fight to preserve our nation’s sovereignty, heritage, security, prosperity, and stature as a nation governed by the rule of law.
The Minuteman Project began just over two years ago as 1200 patriotic volunteers assembled at outposts on the Arizona-Mexico border during April of 2005 to observe and report the most unprecedented invasion of the United States of America in its 231-year history. But, the contest to save our nation cannot be won solely by assembling at outposts on the border.We also need Americans from all walks of life and from every part of the country to carry the minuteman message consistently to our local city councils, our state governments, and through the halls of Congress in Washington, DC.
The Minuteman Project is expanding its efforts to establish a Minuteman Project chapter in every community in the nation…from San Diego, California to Bangor, Maine…from Anchorage, Alaska to Miami, Florida.
The efforts of the many fragmented minuteman groups, acting separately, have been loosely, and weakly, bound together by a commonality of purpose. Yet, without the collective power of a national fraternity, immigration law enforcement advocacy groups cannot match the enormous clout of the combined influence of adversarial organizations who have banded together to force their way into U.S. territory in an effort to establish dominion over the United States of America by sheer numbers.
Americans, we are challenged daily by the combined forces of LULAC, MAPA, AZTLAN, MALDEF, MEChA, and LA RAZA (The “Race”), and their supportive organizations like the SPLC, the ADL, and the ACLU, who have aggregate financial assets of almost $1 billion that pays for their agendas to be run roughshod over mainstream America.
Much of the financial support for these adversaries of American heritage and our nation’s rule of law comes from taxpayer-funded government grants, corporate businesses whose huge profits are attributable to the overwhelming inflow of illegal aliens into the United States, charitable foundations, and from hostile individual donors. Patriotic immigration law advocacy groups like the Minuteman Project, however, receive not one penny, not one red cent, of support from these sources of staggering wealth.
If we are to win this contest with out-of-control federal, state, and local governments and their corporate allies that together encourage, and engage in, the reckless disregard for the rule of law, then we must combine our human and financial resources to build a powerhouse of overwhelming economic and political influence.
We can do this, America.
We have only 15 months to build a multi-state network of chapters in numbers strong enough to influence the course of the 2008 federal and state elections. That election cycle will determine whether the United States of America will remain a unified, sovereign nation governed by its electorate. Or, will our nation become just another prey for the economic interests of transnational corporate empires, or anarchist fanatics whose goal is to plunder the principles established by our Founding Fathers?
The 2008 election cycle is our last chance, Americans.
Please join the Minuteman Project as an independent chapter today by visiting the Minuteman Project web site. To submit an application to license an existing chapter, or start a new chapter, please download the application forms and licensing agreement by clicking on the “Start A Chapter” button on the Minuteman Project home page at http://www.minutemanproject.com The Minuteman Project no longer charges any individual membership fees. This will allow local chapters to assess dues to their specific members and use that money to help cover any costs of maintaining their local group. There is, however, a $100 annual fee for registering your chapter as part of the nationwide Minuteman Project organization.
Thank you, patriots, for supporting the Minuteman Project. Together we can change the course of this mighty nation and steer it in a direction of stability and domestic tranquility.
While corporate barons and their political cronies pledge their allegiance to the almighty greenback and to all the power that money can buy, I ask you, Americans, to pledge your allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the nation for which it stands.
United We Stand,
Jim Gilchrist
Founder and President
Jim Gilchrist’s Minuteman Project, Inc.
(dba The Minuteman Project)
www.MinuteManProject.com

Jim Gilchrist’s MINUTEMAN PROJECT
National Chapter Recruiting Campaign
![]() |
|
The United States Justice Foundation (USJF) has developed the Minuteman Protection Program in order to battle the guerilla war that is being waged to attack patriotic Minuteman volunteers. These valiant men and women are standing in the gap to secure the US from an illegal alien invasion. USJF stands vigilant to take legal action against anyone who seeks to do harm to Minutemen volunteers. We are on call to protect their mission to see the borders and coastal boundaries of the United States made secure against the unlawful and unauthorized entry of all individuals, contraband, and foreign military. We stand ready to help Minutemen at the border and in Washington, DC and in every town where their rights are being infringed. Please Click here to Contribute to These Legal Battles!https://secure.responseenterprises.com/usjfmm/?a=309
In the past year USJF has successfully defended a Minutewoman who was fired from her job because she opposed illegal immigration; a volunteer who was branded with an illegitimate restraining order for his involvement in a documentary video that was speaking the truth about what is going on at the border; and a Minuteman who was arrested for defending himself from an attack from a supporter of illegal aliens. USJF has stood beside these brave Minutemen and is winning the battle against the assaults on those Minutemen volunteers who legally observe and report illegal activities. Even more difficult battles are on the horizon for USJF. Support the USJF and their efforts to defend America’s security, economy, and future from this very real threat by sending a donation. The only way that we can avert this crisis is for the brave people of the United States to take action against it. YOUR actions make a difference! YOUR donation to the USJF is supporting liberty and justice for ALL! My friend, I need to hear from you today With Justice for all, ![]() Gary G. Kreep United States Justice Foundation Minuteman Protection Program www.usjf.net P.S. Your most generous donation NOW will allow USJF to spring into action immediately rather than our having to delay because we have to raise funds to cover our court costs. We must be prepared, because, as you have seen in the recent demonstrations in our major cities, the special interest groups and globalists arrayed against the Minutemen are moving quickly to deploy in opposition to every security initiative the Minutemen propose. Please help USJF act to defend these valiant citizen-volunteers, as they continue to defend America!
Please Contribute to These Legal Battles! CLICK HERE we need you to VOLUNTEER as a Minuteman NOW!https://secure.responseenterprises.com/minutemanhq/registration.php?a=910 CLICK HERE we need your financial help for Border Operation Support!https://secure.responseenterprises.com/minutemanhq/?a=910 |
