On Cue, “al-Qaeda” Threatens Iran

Kurt Nimmo July 10, 2007

For the neocons, “al-Qaeda” is a dream come true. For instance, the current arch nemesis of the clash of civilizations gang, Iran—or rather, the latest target, as the previous target, Iraq, is mired in engineered “sectarian violence,” and other targets, such as Syria, await their turn—has supposedly fallen afoul of “al-Qaeda in Iraq,” as the corporate media reports. “The leader of an al-Qaida umbrella group in Iraq threatened to wage war against Iran unless it stops supporting Shi'ites in Iraq within two months, according to an audiotape,” the Associated Press would have us believe, mostly because we are suckers for these sort of things. “Abu Omar al-Baghdadi, who leads the group Islamic State in Iraq, said his Sunni fighters have been preparing for four years to wage a battle against Shi'ite-dominated Iran,” precisely as their handlers—the CIA, Mossad, and MI6—have planned.

But wait a minute. Didn't the nine eleven whitewash commission conclude that “al-Qaeda” is in cahoots with Hezbollah and thus Iran? “In relation to Iran, commission investigators said intelligence 'showed far greater potential for collaboration between Hezbollah and al Qaeda than many had previously thought.' Iran is a primary sponsor of Hezbollah, or Party of God, the Lebanon-based anti-Israel group that has been designated a terrorist organization by the United States,” the CIA's favorite newspaper, the Washington Post, reported on June 26, 2004, never mind “ancient animosities between Shiite and Sunni Muslims,” an angle mentioned by the Associated Press.

On the one hand, “al-Qaeda” supposedly declares a hankering to attack Iran, while on the other, according to NewsroomAmerica, “al-Qaeda” is “using Iran to organize and launch operations against U.S. and coalition forces in Iraq and elsewhere, western officials say…. The Financial Times reports that while the extent of al-Qaeda operations based in Iran isn't clear, it is believed to be taking place with the direct approval of Iran's hardline Islamic government.”

Go figure.

Last year, the dead Osama bin Laden told “Sunnis in Iraq to retaliate against Shiites, deviating from al Qaeda's stand of not promoting sectarian violence,” CNN reported. Around the same time, the late Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the one-legged master terrorist wonder, “railed against Shiites in a four-hour-long audiotape harangue posted on the Internet” and described as “an unprecedented screed that chronicled what al-Zarqawi said was a Shiite campaign throughout history to destroy Islam and help foreign invaders of Muslim lands,” according to USA Today.

It is precisely this fickle character the neocons love, as Osama and Abu Musab will lash out on cue at Shi'ites one day and team up with them the next, never mind purported genocide, betrayal, or bad feelings spanning centuries. Of course, it helps that the commoners, to say nothing of no shortage of senators, are virtual no-nothings when it comes grasping the difference between Sunni and Shia Islam.

A month after the nine eleven whitewash commission made its absurd claim, Iran “arrested a number of Iranian supporters of Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda group,” ABC News reported. “Iran says it has arrested and repatriated hundreds of Al Qaeda suspects in the last two years,” likely because they recognize a gaggle of CIA-ISI created patsies and mental patients when they see them. Even though the whitewash commission made sure to implicate Iran, “they said there was no evidence that Iran helped Al Qaeda with the attacks on the World Trade Centre in New York and the Pentagon in Washington,” not that a lackadaisical public is capable of making crucial distinctions, as millions remain convinced Saddam and Osama plotted mayhem and mass murder, mostly because they hate our freedom to jack up the credit card at the local mall.

Of course, as Rick Santorum realizes, the American public is easily swayed by such things, never mind the Brothers Grimm character. “In an alarming display of fearmongering, former Republican Senator Rick Santorum has suggested that a series of ‘unfortunate events,' namely terrorist attacks, will occur within the next year and change American citizen's perception of the war,” writes Paul Joseph Watson. “Appearing on the Hugh Hewitt radio show, Santorum also hyped the necessity of “confronting Iran in the Middle East,” and predicted that Giuliani, Romney and Tommy Thompson would be the three surviving Republican candidates who would go head to head in the race for the nomination…. Santorum went on to clearly imply that terror attacks will occur inside America which will alter the body politic and lead to a reversal of the anti-war sentiment now dominating the country.”

Naturally, this “anti-war sentiment” is not only easy for our “representatives” to ignore, as the Democrats pandered to it and then ignored widespread antiwar sentiment after the election was over last November, but it will also be easy to reverse with a bit of manufactured terrorism. Moreover, it is no mistake Santorum mentioned terrorism and Iran in the same breath.

So powerful is “al-Qaeda,” we are told the CIA-ISI created terror organization is operating in India. According to B. Raman, writing for Rediff News, “pro-Al Qaeda jihadi organizations from Pakistan,” including Harkat-ul-Mujahideen, Harkat-ul-Jihad-al-Islami, and Lashkar-e-Tayiba, mostly active in the disputed areas of Jammu and Kashmir, are active in India, primarily because of “India's close relations with the US and Israel. Al Qaeda not only looks upon India as a close associate of the US similar to the UK, but also as providing favorable conditions for its overseas operations directed against US nationals and interests in Indian territory.”

Finally, CIA asset Mahmoud Abbas “said on Monday the Palestinian Islamist movement Hamas is protecting al Qaeda and allowing it to gain a foothold in Gaza,” Reuters reports. “It is Hamas that is protecting al Qaeda, and through its bloody behavior Hamas has become very close to al Qaeda,” said Abbas, blaming the phantom organization, or database. “That is why Gaza is in danger and needs help.”

Actually, Gaza is threatened by Israel, currently engaged in a blockade “threatening to destroy the territory's commercial sector and drive more people into the hands of extremists,” that it to say those resisting occupation. “In the last three weeks, 75 per cent of Gaza's factories have closed because they are not allowed to import raw material or export finished products, forcing thousands of families to rely on food aid to survive,” notes Gisha, an Israeli human rights o

ABC host tells Paul, Gravel they have no chance to win

Raw Story July 9, 2007
David Edwards and Muriel Kane

On Sunday's edition of This Week , ABC's chief Washington correspondent George Stephanopoulos reported on "the long-shot candidates who are lighting up this presidential race:" former Democratic Sen. Mike Gravel and Republican Rep. Ron Paul. While providing both underdogs with prime network coverage, the one-time communications director for President Clinton also told the candidates straight to their faces that he didn't believe either could win.

Stephanopoulous pressed Paul on his calls for immediate withdrawal of the troops from Iraq, saying, "Don't we have a responsibility to those we leave behind?"

It's a tragedy of what's happening, what we're going to leave behind," replied Paul. "But we don't know it's going to be as bad as those who are predicting bad things -- just remember, the people who are predicting these very, very dire things to happen are the same ones who predicted it would be a cakewalk. ... Think of Vietnam. It worked out much better than anybody predicted."

"The main motivating factor of the hostility to this country ... is our presence in the Middle East," continued Paul. "The sooner we get out of there, the better. ... We have done a great service to Osama bin Laden, inadvertently, because it's a recruiting tool for him. ... We have become isolated from the world. .. We have more enemies today, more enemies and less friends than we have ever had in our country."

Stephanopoulos then asked Paul, "What's success for you in this campaign?" but cut off the start of Paul's response, "Well, to win ..." with an interjected "That's not going to happen!"

"Do you know absolutely?" Paul came back. Do you want to bet every cent in your pocket for that? ... The odds are great ... but I would say that what has happened so far has been 100 times greater than I anticipated."

Stephanopoulos next turned to Mike Gravel, whom he described as "something of a sentation" on the Net, due to his debate performance and surreal videos.

"It's a metaphor," said Gravel of his "Rock" video. "You get a fixation of a thought you want to have, something you want to do, and you go do it. ... the ripples, the ripples -- it's a metaphor, George. The ripples show the effect, and then you march off into the horizon."

"What are the ripples you want to send out in this campaign?" asked Stephanopoulos.

"We've got to pull away from politics as usual," answered Gravel, expanding on his statement at the Democratic debate that most of his fellow-candidates lack moral judgment. "They've got the power to end this war, and they're not doing anything about it. And that, in my mind, is immoral."

Gravel insisted that the votes against Bush " are there now" and that you just have to get them. He recalled his own extended filibuster of the draft during the Vietnam War, saying, "Five months, and there's no draft in the United States today, and I'm proud that George Bush does not have the boots on the ground to invade Iran."

When Stephanopoulos pointed out that many Democrats fear their party's opposition to the Vietnam War has cost them political support in the decades since, Gravel retorted, "What's more important? Getting office? Or doing the moral thing and stop people from dying? I'll tell you, if that's the sacrifice we've got to pay to stop these people from dying and killing these Iraqis, I'll pay that sacrifice every day of the week."

Stephanopoulos concluded by saying to Gravel, as he had to Paul, "You're not going to be president." Gravel's response was, "One of the great beauties of this great country of ours is that anything is possible in politics. You just have a tough time accepting it."

The following video is from ABC's This Week , broadcast on July 8.

Transcript:

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: We were back on the trail this week with the long-shot candidates who were lighting up this presidential race. Democrat Mike Gravel served two Senate terms in the 1970s, where he led the fight against the Vietnam War.

SEN. MIKE GRAVEL (D-AK) (Former Senator) From tape.) Our policy in Vietnam is crumbling around our ears today.

Today I publicly announced my candidacy for the vice president.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: And nominated himself vice president in 1972. Seventy-seven now, he wants the top job to stop another war.

SEN. GRAVEL: You know what's worst than a soldier dying in vain is more soldiers dying in vain.

REP. RON PAUL (R-TX) (Former Congressman) From tape.)It was a mistake to go, so it's a mistake to stay and if we make -

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: Republican Ron Paul is the only candidate in his party against the Iraq war from the start. A ten-term congressman from Texas he's also an obstetrician who's delivered more than 4,000 babies.

REP. PAUL From tape.) Vote for the principles of freedom.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: And he was the libertarian candidate for president in 1988. I spoke with both men in Washington on Friday starting with Congressman Paul, who had a nice crowd assemble on the street.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: How's it going?

REP. PAUL: Hi, how are you?

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: He also came with a little news. After a burst of fundraising in a second quarter, he has more campaign cash on hand than the former frontrunner, John McCain.

REP. PAUL: I think some of the candidates are on the downslope, we're on the upslope, so can you imagine what it will be like if we do as well on the next quarter and quadruple our income and our numbers.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: How do you count for? What do you think happened?

REP. PAUL: To simplify, I would say I think people have underestimated the number of people in this country that are interested in a freedom message - just being free, free of the government, you know, oppression of us whether it's on our personal liberties or economic liberties and they certainly like the foreign policy of nonintervention; you know, just to stay out of the internal affairs of others.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: Let me get into that message of nonintervention starting with Iraq. You were the only candidate on the stage in the Republican debates who was against the war in Iraq from the very beginning and you want the troops to get out right now. But don't we have a responsibility to those we leave behind?

REP. PAUL: We have a lot of responsibility, but it's to the American people. We have it to our troops. We need to get them out of a bad situation, we need to get them out of harm's way, and we need to protect the American taxpayer. It's a tragedy of what's happening, what we're going to leave behind, but we don't know it's going to be as bad as those who are predicting bad things. Just remember, people who are predicting these very, very dire things to happen are the same ones who predicted it would be a cakewalk.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: So you are willing to pay the price even if that is the price?

REP. PAUL: Well, it's not - it's not much of a price to save our men and save our taxpayer and change our foreign policy to be more sensible. Think of Vietnam. It worked out much better than anybody predicted. We're achieving with Vietnam what the founders' advised us to achieve with everybody: friendship and trade, not a belligerent attitude of forcing our wishes on other people.

REP. PAUL From tape.) Thank you Mr. Speaker. I rise to urge the Congress to think twice before thrusting this nation into a war without merit.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: You started out as a very lonely voice in the Republican Party, but it seems that more Republicans are inching your way, at least towards starting to pull out from Iraq. Do you believe that come next year the Republican Party position will be it's time to withdraw, it's time to get out?

REP. PAUL: If they are, they can't - they won't have a prayer in the election. I mean, where are their political instincts? That's why they are starting to shift. I mean, we'll take them any way that we can get them - you know, support for a more sane foreign policy.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: You would completely pull out of the Middle East?

REP. PAUL: The main motivating factor of the hostility to this country - I've said it before, it's absolutely true - is our presence in the Middle East. The sooner we get out of there, the better.

REP. PAUL From tape.) Have you ever read about the reasons they attacked us? They attack us because we've been over there. We've been bombing Iraq for ten years.

RUDY GIULIANI From tape.) That's an extraordinary statement. As someone who lived through the attack of September 11th, that we invited the attack because we were attacking Iraq - I don't think I've ever heard that before and I've heard some pretty absurd explanations for September 11th. (Applause)

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: Rudy Giuliani said that you didn't know what you were talking about.

REP. PAUL: Well, that revealed a bit of lack of knowledge, to put it mildy, on his part because there's been so many books - our CIA defends my position. The 9/11 report defends my position. Paul Wolfowitz defends my position

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: You have no regrets for what you said?

REP. PAUL: Oh, no, but he was demagoguing it. Everybody saw through that. He was the great patriot and he was trying to say I'm blaming America. I'm blaming bad policy; I'm not blaming our victims.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: Do you think Rudy Giuliani knows better than what he said?

REP. PAUL: He knows better now. I think he probably just looked at it superficially. He probably looked at the politics of getting the attention of hawkis-type conservatives, and he got the applause so he was probably reinforced. But I'll bet you the week later he wasn't nearly as reinforced because they are using different language now - the general Republican leadership - on this whole issue.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: But President Bush says if we retreat from Iraq, al Qaeda, all of its allies, are going to attack us here at home.

REP. PAUL: Well, I disagree. He believes that and he believes it sincerely, but I don't think he's correct on that because I think we have done a great service to Osama bin Laden, inadvertently, because it's a recruiting tool for him. But what has happened to us? We have become isolated from the world. They charge me with are you an isolationist? No. Isolationism is being practiced today.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: Aren't you proud of being an isolationist?

REP. PAUL: I don't like the word.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: You'd also pull out of the United Nations, you'd pull out of the International Monetary Fund, you'd pull out of the World Bank?

REP. PAUL: Yes, but George Washington wasn't for all those groups either. We didn't have a president for that until after World War II, so I don't think that isolation. I want to trade with people. We have more enemies today and more enemies - more enemies and less friends than we have ever had in our country.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: You ran after president in 1988 as a libertarian.

REP. PAUL From tape.) The libertarian party and the libertarian message offers a choice. It offers a choice for the American people not to have to vote for the lesser of evil.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: You're running as a Republican this time. Why?

REP. PAUL: Well, I was elected to Congress 10 times as a Republican. That's a pretty good reason. I've been able to deliver this constitutional, very libertarian message to my district and they like it and they reelect me. And it's practical. Third parties are - the laws are biased against them. Unless you're a billionaire, you can't even get on the ballot. So that's not very democratic.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: You've also really built up a reputation for living out your libertarian principles. You served, as you said, 20 years in Congress but you're not going to take a congressional pension.

REP. PAUL: Right.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: As an obstetrician, you never took Medicare or Medicaid for your patients.

REP. PAUL: Never.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: You didn't allow your children to take student loans for college?

REP. PAUL: No, because my goal was that they would work and I would help them, and that they wouldn't have debt, but not to borrow from the taxpayers. It's not the government. The government has nothing. They want to steal the credit from somebody who's trying to start a small business someplace. So if you steal credit out, that means there's a pain and suffering for somebody that's invisible. So I wouldn't participate. I consider that an immoral act.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: Do you think the Republican Party has stayed true to its small government principles?

REP. PAUL: They haven't stayed true to their principles about less government. What happened in this administration? They took it over and we had massive increases in entitlements and we have international conflict, so the party has lost its way.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: What's success for you in this campaign?

REP. PAUL: What's success? Well, to win is one.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: That's not going to happen.

REP. PAUL: You know absolutely? You want to bet your every cent in your pocket for that?

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: Yes.

REP. PAUL: You are. Okay. I thought so when I ran for Congress. I wouldn't bet anything I could have been elected to Congress. The odds are great. The odds are difficult and I know that. But I would say that what has happened so far is about 100 times greater than I anticipated. And I think that we have surprised a lot of people already, and I think we're going to surprise a lot more.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: If the odds are stacked against Ron Paul, they're out of this world for Mike Gravel.

SEN. MIKE GRAVEL (D-AK) From tape.) Okay, we're going 90 - we're going 93 north. It's the next exit.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: On the trail, he's on his own.

MS. From tape.) Who are you, dear?

SEN. GRAVEL From tape.) Mike Gravel. I'm Senator Gravel.

MS. From tape.) Are you running for something?

SEN. GRAVEL From tape.) I'm running for president. Yes, I am.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: But on the web, he's something of a sensation thanks to his fiery debates -

SEN. GRAVEL From tape.) And I've got to tell you, after standing up with them, some of these people frighten me. They frighten me.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: - and this surreal campaign video. Gravel stares straight to camera for more than a minute.

What's the point?

SEN. GRAVEL: It's a metaphor. And it's two young teachers in Southern California that wanted to film me and I said fine, you can have as much time as you need. And the metaphor that they see - and I was flattered by it - but it's a metaphor not only for a presidential candidate, for any citizen. What it is you get a fixation of a thought you want to have, something you want to do, then you go do it. We constantly - (unintelligible) - society -

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: Throw a rock in a lake?

SEN. GRAVEL: Listen, the ripples. The ripples - it's a metaphor, George. The ripples show the effect and then you march off into the horizon.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: So let's follow the metaphor. What are the ripples you want to send out in this campaign?

SEN. GRAVEL: Thank you for asking that, because the ripples are that we've got to pull away from politics as usual. I'll give you an example. At the last debate on the 32nd wing at the end I made the statement about their being immoral.

SEN. GRAVEL From tape.) We have to have a president who has moral judgment.

Most of the people on this stage with me do not have that judgment and have proven it by the simple fact of what they've done.

SEN. GRAVEL: It's not their personal life I was talking about. I was talking about the fact that those presidential candidates that are standing up with me, they've got the power to end this war and they're not doing anything about it. And that in my mind is immoral, because as we we're talking then, as we're talking now, George, human beings are dying and American soldiers are getting their bodies blown apart and we're killing Iraqis, and there's no reason for it. We can stop that. And so if they aspire to be president, they ought to show some leadership in the Congress right now to end it. And I've given them the tools to do this with, and they don't pick up on it.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: The tools to do this with? You want to have the president criminally indicted.

SEN. GRAVEL: Oh, yes. Only if he doesn't end the war. Well, stop and think now. They'll say "well, Hillary is classic. Oh, we don't have the votes." What do you mean you don't have the votes? You go get the votes by the scruff of the neck.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: They're not there now.

SEN. GRAVEL: They are there now. They are there now, George. And how you get them is real simple. You turn around and you have a vote on cloture every single day, seven days a week. You cut out the August recess, and then when it comes back and the president vetoes this law, you turn around and have a veto override every single day -

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: The strategy does come from your own personal experience, doesn't it?

SEN. GRAVEL: That's right.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: Vietnam.

SEN. GRAVEL: Vietnam, filibustering, being tough.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: You had a one-man filibuster against the draft.

SEN. GRAVEL: That's right. Five months, and there's no draft in the United States today, and I'm proud that George Bush does not have the boots on the ground to invade Iran.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: You also read the Pentagon papers into the Congressional record.

SEN. GRAVEL From tape.) The papers prove that for 20 years, and certainly for the last 10 years, we have been victims of our Southeast Asia policy, not masters of it.

SEN. GRAVEL: You didn't think that I was treated like a skunk at the party back then? And of course, now we look back "well, my God, this person showed courage." I could have gone to jail.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: It was an emotional time.

(Cross talk.)

SEN. GRAVEL: - show leadership, and the Lee Iacocca's title for his book is "Where Have all the Leaders Gone." Well, George, this leader is back, and I'm a tough leader and I'm going to hold all of these other people accountable. They want to be president? Let them show their bona fides to be president.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: You've said that no person who voted for the war is qualified to be president. That knocks out Hillary Clinton. That knocks out Joe Biden.

SEN. GRAVEL: That's right.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: That knocks out Chris Dodd.

SEN. GRAVEL: That's right.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: That knocks out John Edwards.

SEN. GRAVEL: That's right. And it will knock out Obama if he doesn't shape up and help end the war now, because if he wants to show he's a leader, you do it in the Senate where he is. He's got power.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: He voted against the funding.

SEN. GRAVEL: Hey. They voted four times. He and Hillary voted for this vote that meant nothing on the water bill. What does that mean? That means you're standing there and this is a symbolic vote. Hypocrisy is what it is, George: hypocrisy. People are dying, and they're interested in the symbolic vote? Give me a break.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: The strategy you followed in the 1970s did eventually end the war. You cut off funding, the war ended, but a lot of Democrats fear that the party paid a price. And it kept them out of the White House for years.

SEN. GRAVEL: Well George, you just put your finger on it. What's more important? Getting office or doing the moral thing and stop people from dying? I'll tell you, if that's the sacrifice we've got to pay to stop these Americans from dying and killing these Iraqis, I'll pay that sacrifice every day of the week.

 

RON PAUL

The Untouchable, Unstoppable Ron Paul First they tried to ignore him, then they tried to embarrass him, and now the attack dogs are out in full- force. In a desperate attempt they are trying to dig up any dirt from his past, but Ron Paul doesn't have any skeletons in his closet. He is a model of consistency, which can't be said for most politicians. Pelosi set to quash Dr. Paul's Health Freedom bill Recent News: ABC host tells Paul, Gravel they have no chance to win [VIDEO] Ron Paul on This Week with George Stephanopoulos Paul supporter nearly arrested while campaigning on Independence Day

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: I've been watching you in these debates and you seem to be having the time of your life.

SCOTT SPRADLING (Debate moderator) From tape.) If you are elected president, how, if at all, would use former President Bill Clinton in your administration?

SEN. GRAVEL From tape.) Well, I'd send him as a roving ambassador around the world. He'd be good. He could take his wife with him, it will still be in the Senate. (Laughter.)

SEN. GRAVEL: I don't know if I would say - characterize it as "the time of my life." I'm a passionate person. I feel deeply. And so what I want to do is I want to fight. We are a great country, and we are at the tipping point. I don't know which side we're going to tip on, but '08 is as important election as 1877 when they made the decision that changed the South. Right now, we're going to make a decision in '08 whether we continue to go downhill with our empire building, and I will tell you very frankly that with respect to Hillary and the president, I view them as a package of one. They knew what was going on, but they made a political vote. And that political vote was to give Bush the power to go to war. That's what it was all about. In my mind that is a vote that showed they were morally tone- deaf - the both of them.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: So Hillary Clinton's not going to get your vote. Who is?

SEN. GRAVEL: I'm going to vote for myself. What are you talking about, George?

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: But you're not going to be president.

SEN. GRAVEL: I'll be president when it ends. George, I'll be president. And you know something? One of the great beauties of this great country of ours is that anything is possible in politics. You just have a tough time accepting it.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: Now what I'm thinking of right now, again, is your video, and you say it's a metaphor. You could also say it's a piece of absurd performance art, but it gets attention. And you are getting attention in this campaign. My question is, what are you going to do with it?

SEN. GRAVEL: Isn't that how one gets elected? By getting attention? Then people maybe will listen to me when I say I want to empower you as a lawmaker, because the answer is not in government, the answer is with the American people.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: And you're not going to give up until you're president.

SEN. GRAVEL: Of course. And I will be president. You heard it here.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: Everybody deserves to be heard.

23 North Lime Street  Lancaster, PA 17602  contactus@constitutionparty.org

YOUR PARTY, YOUR PRINCIPLES – PASS THIS ON! Mary Starrett Communications Director   QUOTE: "A little matter will move a party, but it must be something great that moves a nation.                                                                                                       ~ Thomas Paine, Rights of Man, 1972 UPCOMING RADIO INTERVIEWS:   July 11, 2007, Gen. Charles Jones - National Veterans Coalition, on www.freedomfighterradio.net, 8pm EDT.    July 12, 2007, Tom Kovach, on www.freedomfighterradio.net, 8pm EDT.    July 16, 2007, Jim Clymer on KMMS, 9:10 to 10a.m. MDT, 1450am, Bozeman, MT, www.kmmsam.com. Host: George Carter.    PRESS RELEASE Survey Says: Americans Aren’t Buying What Two Parties Are Selling   Zogby Poll Shows Majority Eyeing Third Party     Lancaster, PA (July 9, 2007) The Constitution Party  calls attention to a recent Zogby.com poll  which reveals overwhelming voter dissatisfaction with the two parties currently controlling government.   67% of registered voters surveyed voiced unhappiness with the political status quo and called for a solution outside the Republican and Democratic parties.   The poll showed those most disturbed by the present system were those who considered themselves political independents – 80% said they were frustrated with the two party system.   “Americans have seen enough political sleight-of-hand; they’re now inclined to ditch the myth that our country is best served by two dominant parties. Our Founders were clear about the dangers of powerful parties”, said Constitution Party National Committee Chairman Jim Clymer.   “The ‘Tweedle-dee and Tweedle-dum’ political parties have run out of time because voters have run out of patience. The R’s and D’s are virtually indistinguishable at this point”, added Clymer.   Pollster John Zogby wrote: “47% of Republicans are somewhat or very dissatisfied. Only 21% of Democrats feel this way. So it’s looking to me right now like the Democrats are pleased with their candidates.”   “Eyeing the current crop of Republican presidential candidates gives the GOP faithful very little hope they’ll get to vote for someone who represents them- no wonder they’re so discouraged”, commented Jim Clymer. “Americans should refer to the Republican hopefuls as ‘Doctor No, the Three Musketeers and the Seven Dwarfs’:   “Congressman Ron Paul, dubbed ‘Doctor No’ (for consistently voting against un-constitutional programs, higher taxes and big-government spending) is the only clear choice and he’s been taking a drubbing by GOP leadership. The Three Musketeers, Tancredo, Hunter and Gilmore have solid positions on some issues but none make the ‘constitutionally-correct’ grade”, noted Clymer.   Giuliani, McCain and Romney are so far to the left Constitutional conservatives couldn’t possibly consider voting for them - they’re included among The Seven Dwarfs, along with Huckabee, Brownback, Thompson and Gingrich.   The Zogby poll comes on the heels of another national survey (http://rasmussenreports.com) which shows the number of Republicans has been falling for two years straight and now hovers around 30%.   The Rasmussen poll also found the number of people identifying themselves as Democrats has fallen to its lowest level in a year and a half and is gauged at about 37%. This substantiates a trend of Americans continuing to lose faith in both “Big Box” parties.   As a result, the number not affiliated with either major party has jumped to another all-time high—almost 33%.   That means there are now more Independents than there are Republicans.   The Constitution Party - the only FEC recognized national political party that is pro-life, pro-secure borders and pro-second amendment - encourages voters to “think outside the box” and examine the ideological pedigrees of all candidates for office.   - 30 -

Dear American Patriots,

The Minuteman Project supports all independent Minutemen/women/children organizations and wishes them Godspeed in helping resolve the chaotic illegal alien invasion of the USA.
 
Some day, hopefully soon, we will win the contest we wage with our corrupt political governors and bureaucrats.  When the war is won we will all be able to get back to taking our grand kids fishing again and reminisce about how we fought and won the Second Revolutionary War without firing a shot.
 
So far, all the bullets fired have been at us, not by us.
 
Let’s move forward with "the mission," fellow patriots.  The best way to avoid counter-productive infighting is to do exactly what you are doing:  start your own group with its own sovereignty and its own SOP within the rules of law.

The Minuteman Project remains open to participation by, and with, any minuteman group regardless of its minuteman group affiliation.  If you would like our involvement in any operation or project you are planning, please contact us.

Our real enemies are not ourselves.  Our targets should not be competing MM groups.  The real targets of our wrath are the cavalier bureaucrats and their business, academic, and media collaborators who have encouraged and sponsored the most unprecedented invasion of U.S. territory in the 231-year history of the United States of America.

Stand your ground, Minutemen!  If it’s a war our political governors want, then let it begin here!  We will fight them with the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America and under the rule of law.  Surrender is NOT an option.  Nor is servitude to a North American Union.  We will not quit!

And remember, just as our forefathers who served under General George Washington discovered, no victory comes without a price, a sacrifice, a commitment, a suffering.  Each of us will come under attack by reconquistas, anarchists, and selfish political hacks who seek dominion over our souls and the fulfillment of their selfish personal agendas.  Sometimes it will seem that all is lost and we are fighting a losing battle.  And sometimes, we will turn upon ourselves in our competitive zeal to save our country.
 
Be not despaired, dis-enheartened, nor distracted from “the mission”.  This war will be won, patriots.  It will be won in much the same way our country was taken from us over a 40-year span:  incrementally.  It is only a matter of time, sacrifice, and perseverance.

I leave you with a compelling exhortation from a famous naval admiral:
 
“DAMN THE TORPEDOES!  FULL SPEED AHEAD!”
 
Come on, Americans.  Let’s roll !
  
Cheers,

Jim Gilchrist, Founder and President - The Minuteman Project
   
    - A multi-ethnic, immigration law enforcement advocacy group.                                                                       
    - Operating within the law to support enforcement of the law.
 
THE MINUTEMAN PROJECT
JIM GILCHRIST, PRESIDENT
P.O. BOX 3944
LAGUNA HILLS, CA.  92654-3944
 
Visit us at:    www.minutemanproject.com
 
Also visit my personal web site at:
www.jimgilchrist.com

 

Can You Imagine This Country?
By Chuck Baldwin
July 10, 2007


This column is archived at
http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/c2007/cbarchive_20070710.html


We hear much today about the American dream. By "the American dream,"
most people mean buying a big house, driving an expensive automobile,
and making a lot of money. However, this was not the dream envisioned
by the Founding Fathers. Remember that, for the most part, America's
founders gave up their material wealth and substance for something
they considered of far greater worth. Unfortunately, this hedonistic
generation knows little of the kind of sacrificial spirit personified
in the lives of America's patriarchs.

In the minds of the founders, liberty--with all of its intrinsic
risks--was more desirable than material prosperity, if that prosperity
was accompanied with despotism or collectivism. So strong was their
desire that they were willing to give up the latter in order to
procure the former for themselves and their posterity.

How dare Americans today refer to material gain as "the American
dream." It is not! It is the freedom to honestly pursue one's goals
that should be celebrated. Material gain is only a fruit of freedom,
not its root.

Furthermore, much of America's gain today is predicated upon
dishonorable and even dishonest practices. We have become a nation of
gamblers and socialists. We allow an unconstitutional tax system to
tax our brains out. Rather than cast off a tyrannical tax system,
however, we choose to cast away the noble virtue of industry and hard
work (because government will wind up with most of it, anyway) in
favor of receiving revenue from the labor and effort of others. It is
called socialism, and most Americans today (including Christians)
appear to fully embrace it.

We expect government to fund our retirement, to reimburse our losses,
and to even pay for our health care. What we cannot get from Uncle
Sam, we expect from Lady Luck. Americans today want the fruit of
freedom but seem unwilling to pay its purchase price. It was not
always this way.

Can you imagine a nation without an I.R.S.? Can you imagine a nation
with little crime and where children were free to pray in schools?
Can you imagine a nation where the father's income was able to
adequately provide for his household? Can you imagine a country with
low divorce rates and where virtually everyone with a high school
diploma could both read and write and was capable of earning his or
her way in society?

Can you imagine a nation without an A.C.L.U. or a N.E.A.? Can you
imagine a country that did not legally murder its own unborn children
and that would not pander to sexual deviants or criminals? Can you
imagine a country that did not glorify, much less sponsor, gambling?
Can you imagine a nation with strong state governments and a limited
federal government?

Can you imagine a country where you could order a firearm through a
catalog and where there was no such thing as a B.A.T.F.E.? Well, you
might not be able to imagine such a country, but that was the kind of
nation our founders dreamed about, fought for, and bequeathed to their
posterity.

Unfortunately, since World War II, we Americans have seemed willing to
squander the sacrifice and repudiate the principles of our ancestors.
With the way things are going, can you imagine what this nation will
look like in another 50 years?

(c) Chuck Baldwin

NOTE TO THE READER:

This email editorial cannot be considered Spam as long as the sender
includes contact information and a method of removal.

To subscribe, click on this link and follow the instructions:
http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/subscribe.php

To unsubscribe, click on this link and follow the instructions:
http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/unsubscribe.php

Chuck Baldwin's commentaries are copyrighted and may be republished,
reposted, or emailed providing the person or organization doing so
does not charge for subscriptions or advertising and that the column
is copied intact and that full credit is given and that Chuck's web
site address is included.

Editors or Publishers of publications charging for subscriptions or
advertising who want to run these columns must contact Chuck Baldwin
for permission. Radio or television Talk Show Hosts interested in
scheduling an interview with Chuck should contact
chuck@chuckbaldwinlive.com.

When responding, please include your name, city and state. And, unless
otherwise requested, all respondents will be added to the Chuck Wagon
address list.

Please visit Chuck's web site at http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com.