Bravenet Blog 
Blog Community
Get a Free Blog
Manage your Blog
V: "People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people."
Welcome Back The Spotlight 'O Terror
Green - Low: This setting is here just as a reference point. DHS will never use it because it would mean we didn’t need them anymore.
Blue - Guarded: This rarely used setting on the Stoplight ‘O Terror could indicate things like an undocumented worker within 3 square miles of the president.
Yellow - Elevated: This is the standard level of fear. Don’t expect to see anything lower than this as long as the Regressives are in office. Be scared, but not too scared to vote Republican.
Orange - High: Chertoff heard that someone in the CIA’s brother’s boss’ nephew’s sister-in-law heard about a plan to blow up Amish Country Popcorn Factory in Berne Indiana. It’s ok to pee your pants at this level.
Red - Severe: A terror attack was recently narrowly averted. We can’t release any details but just be thankful we saved your asses. Used frequently before midterm elections. See October Surprise. (Oh My God, Take Away My Freedoms and Protect Me From Them There Terrorists, Like Osama Hussein!!!)
Welcome to my Blog, enjoy your stay!
Congressman Ron Paul, MD - We've Been NeoConned
1984 radio broadcast:
'Eyes Wide Shut' Party Full of European Royalty, Strippers
A multitude of European royalty attended a "Heaven and Hell" party hosted by Prince Pavlos (Greek)-- a costumed affair which included strippers and seemingly resembles the portrayal of decadent elites depicted in Stanley Kubrick's 'Eyes Wide Shut.'
The London Mail story mentioned about a dozen spare princes and lords, including high profile Prince Andrew of the UK, as well as models and erotic dancers.
"Other guests included Prince Andrew, Viscount Linley, looking mean and moody in black leather as he arrived on his motorbike, Prince Felipe and Princess Christina of Spain, Prince Haakkon of Norway and Naomi Campbell."
"The swimming pool in the basement was covered over and decked out to resemble Hell, with stilt-walkers and erotic dancers."
Of course, this gossip scene is more in line with Paris Hilton-style scandal, but the stories from Bohemian Grove and Bilderberg don't get reported in tabloids.
Full story here.
Video: Infowars & We Are Change Confront Democrats
Biden admits flip flops on statements about meeting 9/11 financier
Prison Planet June 18, 2007
Steve Watson
Infowars reporter Luke Rudkowski from wearechange.org has released video taken at the recent Democratic debates in New Hampshire showing his team confronting leading Democrats Joe Biden and Bill Richardson in addition to David Gergen, the former advisor to Bill Clinton.
In the press room after the debate Rudkowski asked Presidential candidate Joe Biden to explain his meeting with Pakistani ISI General Mahmoud Ahmad two days after the attack on the twin towers and the Pentagon when he was acting as Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
According to the FBI and as confirmed by various news reports at the time , Mahmoud Ahmad instructed Omar Saeed Sheikh, the alleged assassin of Daniel Pearl, to wire $100,000 to alleged lead hijacker Mohammed Atta in the summer of 2001.
| ||
| News, Links & Quotes By Mary Starrett, Communications Director Contents: 1. Upcoming Radio Interviews 2. New Articles Posted on CP National Website 3. Quote - Benjamin Franklin 4. Today's Press Release - $4 Billion and a Free Lunch 1. Upcoming Radio Interviews - Be sure to listen in and pass the word along to family and friends: 2. New Articles Posted on National Website: · Amnesty Bill Rises From the Dead EagleForum.com
"Rebellion against tyrants is obedience to God." 4. Press Release:
$ 4 Billion and a Free Lunch President’s Last Ditch Efforts To Force Amnesty on Americans Is Met With Outrage By Those Who Remind Him: “No Means No!” Lancaster, PA/June 18, 2007: The Constitution Party joins Americans across party lines in expressing indignation at President Bush’s heavy-handed attempts to force passage of a dangerous and unwanted immigration bill (S134 The so-called Kyl-Kennedy bill contains provisions for granting amnesty to millions of illegal aliens and was soundly rejected by Republican senators (only 7 of 45 voted for the bill). After the demise of the bill President Bush made a rare trip to Capitol Hill for a lunch meeting with Republican senators aimed at getting them to change their minds and support the onerous bill. After that Bush offered money as an incentive saying: “I support an amendment that will provide $4.4 billion in immediate additional funding for securing our borders and enforcing our laws at the work site.” “This bill cannot be fixed with free lunches, billions of dollars and endless rhetoric about ‘securing’ borders. It’s a bad bill and it needs to die,” said Constitution Party National Committee Chairman Jim Clymer. “The president has once again betrayed his conservative base with his ‘in your face’ determination to make this bill law. Bush’s comment ‘See you at the bill signing’ illustrates just how contemptuous he is of the will of the people,” Clymer further noted. The Constitution Party, the country’s third largest political party based on voter registrations (Ballot Access News) applauds the millions of ‘no amnesty’ calls made to the capitol switchboard to register alarm over provisions in this bill. “The disdain for this bill is clear. After the lunch-time arm-twisting Bush had the arrogance to offer $4 billion when for the last six years his administration has not only refused to enforce immigration law but has punished Border Patrol Agents for doing their jobs,” Clymer pointed out. Agents Jose Compean and Ignacio Ramos, imprisoned since January, were prosecuted for actions in the course of performing their duties in seeking to arrest an illegal Mexican drug smuggler. The two Americans have distinguished military and Border Patrol service records and face a combined sentence of 23 years in prison. The Constitution Party is the only political party to pass a resolution condemning the treatment of the Border Patrol Agents.
The Constitution Party opposes any immigration bill that gives legal status to illegal aliens. The rejected bill (forced through by the Senate without due time for debate) and the reworked version are, by definition, amnesty bills. The heavy-handed actions of the president and the Senate to force this bill’s passage have no place in a constitutional republic. The Constitution Party supports enforcement of current immigration laws (USC Title 8, Chapter 12) which call for fines and imprisonment for illegal entry into the The Constitution Party is the only party recognized by the Federal Election Commission which is completely: Pro-Secure Borders Pro-Life Pro-Second Amendment |
http://www.counterpunch.org/carter1220.html
http://www.thoughtcrimenews.com/bushrape.htm
http://www.opednews.com/thoreau1103bush_rape_suicide.htm
Docket Sheet
http://ccweb.co.fort-bend.tx.us/imgcache/civil1986255-1-1.pdf
Plaintiff's petition
http://ccweb.co.fort-bend.tx.us/imgcache/civil1986144-1-7.pdf
Citation that was sent to Bush
http://ccweb.co.fort-bend.tx.us/imgcache/civil2018127-1-1.pdf
Motion on mediation
http://ccweb.co.fort-bend.tx.us/imgcache/civil1987591-1-4.pdf
Motion to dismiss due to Plaintiff's death.
http://ccweb.co.fort-bend.tx.us/imgcache/civil3636872-1-4.pdf
All other information about this case listed at the link below:
Charges against Bush
The site where this information is located is a texas state government website. It is down between the hours of 8:00p.m. to 1:30a.m. for site maintenance.
Here's the original article from the Fort Bend Star.
http://www.fortbendstar.com/Archives/2002_4q/121102/n_Woman%20files%20lawsuit%20against%20President.htm
And here is the original article about the womans death. It is the article shown in the image above.
http://www.fortbendstar.com/Archives/2003_4q/122403/n_Woman%20who%20filed%20lawsuit%20found%20dead.htm
Steven Mosher
Tuesday, June 19, 2007
The news that Chinese toothpaste brands sold in Panama, the Dominican Republic, and Australia contained diethylene glycol, a highly toxic chemical used in engine coolants, came as a shock to U.S. health officials.
It shouldn't have.
China, as anyone who has lived there knows, has virtually no safety controls on food and drugs. At the same time, it is in the midst of a no-holds-barred drive to increase its exports, and is heavily subsidizing its manufacturers to ship container loads of cheap goods of all kinds to the U.S. and other overseas markets. As a result, over the past few years, China has stealthily become the second-largest supplier of foreign toothpaste — and many other questionable food and drug products — to the U.S. market.
U.S. health officials responded by pledging to check all shipments of toothpaste coming from China. We have even offered to send inspectors to China. (An offer that China quickly rejected.) But why should the Food and Drug Administration — and ultimately the U.S. taxpayer — have to bear the entire burden of testing suspect Chinese-made food and drugs at all?
As a practical matter, the FDA is no more capable of inspecting the flood of Chinese imports than the Border Patrol is capable of containing the flood of illegal immigrants. Take food imports, for example. Right now, 25,000 shipments arrive on our shores from China and other countries every single day. David Acheson, recently named to the new job of FDA commissioner for food protection, told the Baltimore Sun: "Right now, we inspect 1 percent of food imports. If we were to inspect 2 percent, would that problem go away? I don't think so."
The FDA was not able to stop the recent poisoning of American pets, for example. Unscrupulous Chinese exporters had sold wheat flour laced with a deadly chemical, melamine, to the United States. Some was sold as livestock feed. Other shipments found their way into American dog and cat food, killing or sickening thousands of animals and leading to the recall of more than 100 brands of pet food.
American citizens, rather than their pets, could easily be the next victims.
If the goal is to keep out harmful Chinese products, there is a better way. Why not just ban all shipments of suspect food and drugs from China until the Chinese government itself proves that its products are safe? After all, this is exactly what China does to us.
A single case of mad cow disease in 2003 led China to ban all U.S. beef imports. This ban remains in place today, long after temporary bans put in place by other countries have been lifted. To put it another way, China plays hardball in its trade with the U.S., while we play tiddlywinks.
Putting the burden of proof on Beijing will, of course, unavoidably reveal certain truths about our Chinese trading "partners." Chief among these truths is the fact that corrupt and profit-driven Chinese officials are not only unwilling but fundamentally unable to ensure that all of their exports meet international standards.
Poisoned toothpaste, tainted wheat, and baby bibs laced with lead (another recent scare) are not just the products of individual Chinese factories, they are the products of the Chinese system.
U.S. officials are said to be concerned about "China's standards," and are pushing for more written codes and regulatory inspections. This would all be risible were America's health not at stake. The truth is that China has no standards worthy of the name. What it does have is a pervasive culture of corruption that makes it possible for virtually any offical, up to and including the head of China's FDA, to be bribed.
Two-thirds of the Chinese people are reportedly worried about food safety. As well they should be. Outlook Weekly, an official publication, admitted recently that most of China's 450,000 food makers operate outside the law. Over 60 percent neither conduct mandatory safety tests nor have the ability to do so, while a full third do not even have a government license.
Although the publication ducked the question, it is not difficult to see how this came about: In a culture of corruption the existence of regulations and required inspections is only relevant in that it enables officials to charge more for their venality.
Despite massive problems with food safety, the Chinese government blandly claims that only 196 peopled died of food poisoning in 2006. By way of comparison, the comparable number for the U.S., according to the Centers for Disease Control, is 5,000. (See CDC, http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/eid/vol5no5/mead.htm.)
Given that the U.S. population is only a quarter of China's, and that its system of food handling and inspections is vastly more safe and sophisticated, the real number of deaths for China is probably on the order of 100,000. The fact that Chinese government statistics, where they are published at all, are unreliable further underlines the fundamental dishonesty that permeates the system.
What are we to make of President Hu Jintao's decision to execute the disgraced head of China's Food and Drug Administration, Zheng Xiaoyu? Some would argue that this indicates that the Communist Party leadership is finally getting serious about cleaning up the nation's food and drug supply.
That, of course, is precisely what we are supposed to think.
In reality, it was Zheng's misfortune to come to trial precisely when American pets were sickening and dying. Any other time, and an official as senior as Zheng, who had taken less than a million dollars in bribes — chump change by Chinese standards — would have simply been jailed. But as it was, he will be sacrificed, in order to protect China's exports.
Most Americans don't understand that China's economic growth depends heavily on exports, particularly to the United States. Domestic consumption within China is suppressed. The Chinese people are not allowed to buy most of the products produced for export, which in turn pushes the savings rate up to an incredible 25 percent or so. This money is then reinvested in new factories, technology, and production lines, all of which results in even more goods for export.
This China economic model, as it might be called, has produced the highest growth rates ever registered for a developing country. This year, if not the next, China's total exports will surpass those of the United States. China is well on its way to becoming the world's most wealthy and powerful country.
A boycott of Chinese-made goods by American consumers, however, might just derail China's export-driven growth at this critical juncture. And repeated food and drug scares might prompt just such a boycott. By executing Zheng Xiaoyu, China hopes to convince the world that, one day soon, it will begin playing by the rules.
Don't count on it.
Let China prove its food and drugs are safe for export, or let it keep and consume them at home.
Steven Mosher is the president of the Population Research Institute.
Dear Fellow American,
As we suspected would happen, the White House has now struck a deal with the Senate to revive from the dead the outrageous amnesty bill. It may well pass in the Senate in the next few weeks unless we work even harder to defeat it again.
We greatly appreciate your help in contacting your Senators over the last few months on this issue, and we hoped the Senate had gotten the message that Americans do not want amnesty. Senator Trent Lott has essentially declared war on all Americans opposed to amnesty and talk radio with his recent quote: “Talk radio is running America. We have to deal with that problem.”
The correct response to Senator Lott and the other supporters of amnesty is: No matter how many times you have called your Senators, please CALL AGAIN and tell them America does not want amnesty no matter how much they try to disguise it, or no matter how much "border security" they promise to include in it.
Senator Jim DeMint, Republican of South Carolina said regarding mixing border security and amnesty: "There’s no reason why we should be forced to tie amnesty to it.” The Congress must pass a bill to just seal the border, including building a full 2,000 mile fence.
ACTION ITEMS:
Senators usually refuse to respond to or even read emails sent from residents in other states, so we encourage you to forward this message to your friends in other states to increase our influence.
TALKING POINTS:
Thank you very, very much for your help. With your continued action and support we can this time convince the Senate and White House that Americans really mean it when we say "No Amnesty!"
Best,
Art Harman
Webmaster
The Conservative Caucus
703-938-9626
Visit www.ConservativeUSA.org
Read Howard Phillips' Constitutional Commentaries at:
P.S. Donations will help bring our message to more Americans!
www.conservativeusa.org/donate.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To support this and our many important projects with a donation,
please call us at 703-938-9626 or go to our secure credit card page:
www.conservativeusa.org/donate
E-mail us at webmaster@conservativeUSA.org with any questions or to remove your name.
We invite you to forward this to friends and co-workers--or sign up to get your own at
https://www.ifr-ors.com/wpr.cfm?wp=152
The Conservative Caucus * 450 Maple Avenue, E. * Vienna, VA 22180
even after the bill was rejected and encourages vigilance as this bill is “revived.”
bravenet.com